Who is Ben John?(White extremist Ben John, 22, who was told by a judge to read classic literature after being found guilty of a terrorism offence is JAILED ) Wiki, Bio, Age,Family,

Ben John

Ben John Wiki

                        Ben John Biography

Who is Ben John?

A former neo-Nazi college student who was given a suspended prison sentence and told to read classic literature after being convicted of a terrorism offense has been jailed for two years after his original sentence was overturned.

Ben John, who was described as a white supremacist with a Hitler-inspired ideology, was given a two-year suspended sentence at Leicester Crown Court last August after he was found guilty of terrorism offences.

The 22-year-old had amassed more than 67,000 documents, including bomb-making literature and anti-Semitic material, Lincolnshire Police said.

But Judge Timothy Spencer QC concluded that the crime was “an act of adolescent insanity”, sensationally ruling that John could stay out of prison as long as he read Shakespeare and Dickens classics rather than far-right works.

The Attorney General’s Office returned John’s sentence to the Court of Appeals after campaigners called the suspended sentence “pathetic.”

Today, John did not react when Lord Justice Holroyde overturned the original sentence, finding it illegal, and ordered him to serve two years in prison.

Lord Justice Holroyde said:

Lord Justice Holroyde said: “We are convinced that there should be an immediate prison sentence.”

John, who attended the hearing via video link, must surrender to police by 4:00 p.m. m. meter. on Thursday, Lord Justice Holroyde said.

Solicitor General Alex Chalk QC personally attended the hearing at the Royal Courts of Justice in London to argue that John’s sentence should be increased.

John had first been identified as a terrorist risk days after his 18th birthday and was referred to Prevent, the government’s counter-extremism body.

Despite repeated interventions, John continued to download “repellent” far-right documents, as well as a copy of The Anarchist Cookbook, which includes diagrams and instructions on how to build explosives.

Solicitor General Alex Chalk QC

Solicitor General Alex Chalk QC, who brought the AGO’s case to the Court of Appeal, said there were “real concerns” about John’s online activity, as he liked far-right material on social media days after to tell the judge that he had given up such thoughts.

Richard Wormald QC, representing John, said his client was “a little boy” when he first came across the document, one of thousands in an “electronic library” that also included Marxist literature.

Pointing to the effect pretrial detention had on the defendant, he said the judge’s decision to suspend the sentence was “totally sensible, carefully constructed and appropriate,” with a “robust” rehabilitation program also underway.

Lord Justice Holroyde, sitting with Justice Lavender and Sir Nigel Davis, said certain offenses required a mandatory year of leave, but a suspended sentence and license cannot last more than two years, making John’s sentence “unlawful.” “.

“The judge had no power to impose a suspended sentence like he did,” he said.

After the hearing, Chalk said he was “pleased” to see that the judges found the original sentence “unduly lenient.”

“The government is committed to confronting terrorism in all its forms, including from the extreme right,” he said.

“We remain focused on disrupting the activities of the most dangerous extremists, supporting those who oppose their hateful rhetoric, and protecting vulnerable people caught up in terrorism.”

Read Next:Who is Kerry Bell?(LA nurse, 70, dies at hospitalWikicnn

Ben John Quicks and Facts

  • A neo-Nazi university student has been jailed after his sentence was quashed
  • Ben John was caught with 67,788 white supremacist and neo-Nazi documents 
  • He was also found to have downloaded The Anarchist Cookbook on a hard drive 
  • But a judge told John to read classic novels instead of sending him to jail
  • Attorney General Suella Braverman referred John’s case to the Court of Appeal  
  • Campaigners had branded the neo-Nazi’s suspended sentence ‘pathetic
Show More

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.